In the
business community, it is widely recognised that it is not a good look to go
broke, through bankruptcy or liquidation, but it is not illegal. The illegality
of insolvency comes from the specific conduct of the people at the time.
One type of conduct that I have discussed
previously in this column is the “phoenix activity”—it involves a director or
directors arranging for a new company to rise from the ashes of an old
liquidated company, looking deceptively similar by using effectively the same
name, brand or goodwill.
But if the
conduct is not defined under the law, then it is not a crime to engage in the
conduct.
It is not
always appreciated that if a company is merely suffering from cash flow
difficulties, the directors personally (even without a director’s guarantee)
owe a duty to creditors:
Once a company becomes insolvent, then the
directors’ duty to consider the interests of creditors gives rise to a duty not
to prefer some creditors over other creditors and contributories who have
claims on the fund in liquidation. Thus if directors of an insolvent company
decide to prefer creditors with guaranteed debts, they may be held to be in
breach of their duties as owed to the company.
Regardless of these rules, it is not a crime
to set up a “phoenix” company. There is no such thing as a “phoenix” company
under the laws of our country.
There have been some recent attempts to change
the laws, but they have not yet all been passed. The driving force behind the
changes has been the ATO. Interestingly, these changes were proposed following
the release of a discussion paper by the ATO, which was focussed upon
fraudulent “phoenix” activity and not “phoenix” activity alone. ASIC often
fails to differentiate between the two and regularly refers to “phoenix”
activity alone as amounting to misconduct. Contact Steve or Tina of Sothertons
to learn how to identify a potential “phoenix” company on 07 4972 1300.
No comments:
Post a Comment